USPTO serial 79356299
X.PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X.PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen Goodman
Kristen Goodman Reising Ethington, PC755 W. Big Beaver Rd. Suite 1850Troy, MI 48168United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services in areas of technical consulting for real estate and building purchases and builds, monitoring of construction projects, asset management, condition assessments of building and equipment systems, and building sustainability audits, business management and business administration in the areas in areas of technical consulting for real estate and building purchases and builds, monitoring of construction projects, asset management, condition assessments of building and equipment systems, and building sustainability audits | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction, namely, building construction; repair work, namely office building repair; installation work, namely commercial building systems, ventilation, renovations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creation of computer programs for data processing and for business technical consulting in the areas of commercial real estate building purchases and builds, asset management, monitoring construction projects and construction asset management, condition assessments of buildings and equipment systems, and building sustainability audits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |