Drawing for MAISEN

USPTO serial 79356757

MAISEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAISEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oils and fats; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; meat; pork; processed meat products, namely, ham, sausage, and tonkatsu being semi-cooked pork cutlets; processed seafood; crumbled and seasoned cooked meat; processed seafood croquettes, meat croquettes, potato croquettes, frozen seafood croquettes, frozen meat croquettes, frozen potato croquettes; frozen pork cutlets; processed vegetables and fruits; instant or pre-cooked curry stew; mixes for making soup; canned and retort pouched ton-jiru being miso soup with pork; retort pouched instant miso soup; retort curry stew in the nature of prepared meals with and without riceACTIVE
030Confectionery, namely, rice crackers and rusks; bread and buns; seasonings, other than spices; tonkatsu sauce being sauces for deep-fried pork cutlets; cooking salt with spices and herbs; spices; Chinese stuffed dumplings (gyoza, cooked); sandwiches; tonkatsu sandwiches in the nature of sandwiches with deep-fried pork cutlets; Chinese steamed dumplings (shumai, cooked]; sushi; takoyaki, namely, fried balls of batter mix with small pieces of octopus; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat (niku-manjuh); hamburger sandwiches; tonkatsu hamburger sandwiches in the nature of sandwiches with deep-fried pork cutlets; pizzas; boxed lunches consisting primarily of rice, with added meat, fish or vegetables; box lunches consisting primarily of rice with added tonkatsu being deep-fried pork cutlets; hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; katsudon, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of rice with added breaded porkACTIVE
043Providing foods and beverages; providing food in the nature of deep-fried pork cutlets; food and drink catering; catering services, namely, providing catered meals, mainly hors d'oeuvreACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 18, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 17, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 28, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 21, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 1, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 21, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 26, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 4, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 3, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 20, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 14, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 12, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2022SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance