USPTO serial 79357562
FRANKLY AMSTERDAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANKLY AMSTERDAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bedding, except linen; soft furnishings [cushions]; furniture; pouffes [furniture]; fitted fabric furniture covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Linens; bed linen; textile goods for use as bedding; woven fabrics; fabrics for the manufacture of furnishings; travelling rugs [lap robes]; duvets; curtains of textile or plastic; door and window curtains; bed linen; pillowcases; cushion covering materials; napery of textile; textile material; wall hangings of textile; bed covers; bath linen; bath sheets; bath mitts; hand towels of textile; table mats [table linen]; materials for soft furnishings; bed blankets; unfitted fabric furniture covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets [textile]; carpets; rugs (floor -); mats; runners [mats]; carpet inlays | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and consultancy in relation to design of textiles; design and consultancy in relation to design of home accessories; design and consultancy in relation to design of rugs, carpets, mats and matting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |