USPTO serial 79357852
BRYTER ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASON, JARED MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRYTER ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Organizing and conducting of live performances; organizing and conducting of Hackathon events [education and training]; organizing and conducting of conferences and workshops in relation to the use of technology for business customers; electronic publishing of texts in the nature of magazines and brochures in relation to the use of technology for business customers and providing information thereto; all, of the aforesaid services in particular for use in the fields of legal, audit, tax and compliance consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of software, including computer software, data processing programs, database software, application software, data and file management and database software as well as software for creating and publishing digital applications to automate workflows and respond to recurring requests; software as a service [SAAS] featuring data and file management and database software as well as software for creating and publishing digital applications to automate workflows and respond to recurring requests; cloud computing; cloud hosting provider services; providing virtual computer environments through cloud computing; consultancy in the field of design, development and implementation of software, software as a service [SAAS] and cloud computing, in particular data and file management and database software as well as software for creating and publishing digital applications to automate workflows and to answer recurring requests; all of the aforesaid services in particular for technical applications in the fields of legal, audit, tax and compliance consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |