USPTO serial 79358701
NOBLEZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOBLEZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines; sparkling wines; fruit wines; still wines; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; natural sparkling wines; sparkling fruit wine; sparkling grape wine; strawberry wine; sweet wines; table wines; grape wine; wine punches; white wines; rose wines; dessert wines; wine-based beverage, namely, piquette; fortified wines; red wines; aperitif wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |