USPTO serial 79358815
HYUNDAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PULVERMACHER, TASHA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYUNDAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T. J. Weigell
Charles T. J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 W. 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys for pets for promoting sale of automobiles; ornaments for Christmas trees, except lights, candles, and confectionery; toys being playthings, namely, infant toys, stuffed toys, plush toys; toy cars; dolls; toys namely, water toys; scale model vehicles; toy vehicles; toy aircraft; toy robots; toy drones; remote controls for operating radio controlled scale model vehicles; electric ride-on toy cars for children and infants; toys designed to be attached to car seats; miniature toy sports games; portable handheld games consoles and portable musical toys incorporating telecommunication functions; games in the nature of board games and card games; video game consoles; physical exercises machines; bags specially adapted for sports equipment; gymnastic apparatus and sport balls; golf bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |