USPTO serial 79358988
GREATCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFITHS, SYDNEY V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREATCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals and chemical products used in science and industry including those used in the manufacture of photovoltaic devices and perovskite solar cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Apparatus for manufacture in the fields of nano-technology, photoelectrochemistry and solar power including perovskite solar cell technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric and electronic equipment and apparatus; photovoltaic apparatus and installations for generating electricity; machines and apparatus for controlling and distributing solar power; scientific, research and laboratory apparatus and teaching apparatus in the fields of nano-technology, photoelectrochemistry and solar power including perovskite solar cell technology; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; photoelectric cells; photovoltaic cells and arrays thereof; photovoltaic apparatus for converting solar radiation into electrical energy; inverters and other components for use in solar cell systems; solar panel installations for generating electricity for commercial, residential and industrial premises; photovoltaic apparatus and installations for generating solar electricity; parts, fittings and accessories for all of the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research; research and development in the field of solar energy and photovoltaic technology; industrial design of equipment for manufacturing and scientific purposes including design of solar energy equipment, photovoltaic devices, perovskite solar cells; technological consultancy, technical design and technical planning of photovoltaic installations and solar energy systems; design services including design services relating to solar energy systems including solar panels and related equipment; engineering services; computer and software design and development; material testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |