USPTO serial 79359515
LOTUS AERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOTUS AERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; computer operating programs, recorded; computer programs [downloadable software]; downloadable mobile applications; computer peripheral devices; computer for car navigation; automobile navigation device; car speakers; audio and video receivers; electronic control unit for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobiles; electric cars; electric vehicles; hybrid car; automobile hoods; signal arms for vehicles; vehicle safety alarm; vehicle bumpers; vehicle anti-theft equipment; vehicle electronic reversing alarm | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Audio broadcast; video broadcasting; message sending; communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of digital files; streaming of data; transmission of electronic messages; electronic data interchange [EDI] services; transmission of electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of circuit manufacturing technology for wireless communications, electronic data processing, consumer electronics and automotive electronics; artificial intelligence consultancy; automotive design; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; design and development of virtual reality software; computer programming; computer software design; cloud computing; platform as a service [paas]; vehicle roadworthiness testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |