USPTO serial 79359754
TEIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, kitchen knives, and cutting implements for kitchen use; hand-operated tools and implements for treatment of materials, and for construction, repair and maintenance; lifting tools; spoons; spatulas [hand tools]; stirrers [hand tools] | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Tableware, cookware and containers; bakeware; baking utensils; baking mats; pastry brushes; baking dishes; containers for household or kitchen use; household or kitchen utensils; glasses, drinking vessels and barware; utensils for household purposes; sponges for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Cloth; household textile articles; linens; kitchen and table linens; sponge cloths [textile piece goods]; sponge cloths for textile use; tissues being textile piece goods; gummed waterproof cloth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |