USPTO serial 79359934
KREITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KREITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software reliability software; software; collaboration software platforms [software]; education software; software applications; computer software; educational software; workflow software; dashboard software; enterprise software; reference software; server software; software suites; packaged software; accounting software; AI software; business software; scheduling software; programming software; intranet software; optimisation software; maintenance software; collaborative software; presentation software; financial management software; e-commerce software; software development programmes; internet messaging software; application development software; artificial intelligence software; content management software; cloud computing software; cloud server software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software engineering; software design; software as a service; software as a service [SaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] services; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; platforms for artificial intelligence as software as a service [SaaS]; platforms for graphic design as software as a service [SaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for machine learning; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for deep learning; platform as a service [paas]; platform as a service [PaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software platforms for graphic design; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for deep neural networks; infrastructure as a service [IaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] featuring computer software platforms for artificial intelligence; access control as a service (ACaaS); software consulting services; software maintenance services; software customisation services; software engineering services; software consultancy services; software development services; computer software consultancy services; computer software advisory services; computer software consulting services; platform as a service [PaaS] featuring software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages; computer and software consultancy services; cloud hosting provider services; private cloud hosting provider service; public cloud hosting provider service; cloud computing services; cloud storage services for electronic data; web site hosting services; hosting webpages for others; hosting of digital content; cloud storage services for electronic files; design and development of operating software for cloud computing networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |