USPTO serial 79360100
ARTVOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTVOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administrative processing of purchase orders; demonstration of goods; providing advice and recommendations to consumers of products for commercial purposes; marketing; targeted marketing; administration of consumer loyalty programs; provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs; shop window dressing; commercial intermediation services; search engine optimization for sales promotion; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; rental of sales stands; advertising; online advertising on a computer network; distribution of samples; dissemination of advertising matter; sales promotion for others; promotion of goods and services through sponsorship of sports events; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods in wholesale and retail outlets or in specialized stores; placing on the Internet on web pages and on websites information on the range of goods and advertising information on the list of services provided, which allows customers to conveniently browse, order and buy these goods and order services from web pages and websites on the Internet, as well as receive the necessary' information about these goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |