USPTO serial 79360462
GRIGIO LAVAREDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRIGIO LAVAREDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building/construction/road construction and similar purpose materials made and shaped from concrete, plaster, earth, clay, stone, marble, wood, plastic or synthetic materials: non-metal buildings/structures, building elements, pillars, barriers, natural or synthetic heat sealable coatings, bitumen boards for roofs, bitumen coatings, doors and windows made of wood and synthetic materials; monuments, sculptures made of concrete, stone or marble; non-metal prefabricated swimming pools; unformed materials in this class: sand, gravel, gravel, asphalt, bitumen, cement, lime, plaster, plaster, concrete, block marble; non-luminous and non-mechanical traffic signs, not of metal; construction materials of glass; aquarium sand | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |