USPTO serial 79362023
MGEN TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MGEN TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Internet broadcasting services through individual channels; internet broadcasting services; video broadcasting via the Internet and other communications networks; audio broadcasting via the Internet and other communications networks; audio, video and multimedia broadcasting via the Internet and other communications networks; internet television broadcasting services; live transmissions accessible via home pages on the internet [webcam]; broadcasting of film and television features or programs, including on the Internet, on mobile communications networks and on other media; transmission of video via the mobile and internet; provision of telecommunication access to videos via the internet; transmission of moving pictures via internet; transmission of text message and video; transmission of digital video files for online video-sharing; transmission of video and audio and voice via the internet; broadcasting of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content via Internet protocol and communication networks; broadcasting of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content; education broadcasting via internet; education broadcasting; video streaming services via the internet; transmission of video via cellular telephones and mobile devices; transmission of video content via the Internet; video-on-demand transmission services provided via the Internet; broadcasting of video and audio content via the Internet; video broadcasting services; transmission, broadcasting and reception of audio, video, still and moving images, text and data in real time; transmission, broadcasting and reception of audio, video, still and moving images, text and data; providing an on-line forum; teleconferencing services; video conferencing services; transmission of podcasts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |