USPTO serial 79362439
GREENH2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBLE, JONATHON I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENH2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Gas turbines, not for land vehicles; non-electric prime movers, namely, gas turbines, not for land vehicles; turbines, other than for land vehicles for power generation; electricity generators for power generation; turbines, other than for land vehicles, for use in combined heat and power (CHP) systems; generators of electricity for use in combined heat and power (CHP) systems; alternators; direct current (DC) generators; motors, namely, alternating current (AC) motors and direct current (DC) motors and their parts and fittings, not including those for land vehicles; pneumatic and hydraulic machines and instruments, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic conveyors, door closers; starter motors; gas turbine engines, not for land vehicles; all the foregoing utilizing hydrogen energy | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair or maintenance of gas turbines; repair or maintenance of gas turbines for power generation; installation, maintenance and repair of energy conversion apparatus, namely, energy generating installations and hydrogen energy power plants; maintenance of energy facilities, namely, hydrogen energy power plants; repair or maintenance of power generators; repair or maintenance of power generators for use in combined heat and power (CHP) systems; repair or maintenance of power generators adapted for combined heat and power (CHP) generation; building construction services; installation of power generation equipment adapted for combined heat and power (CHP) generation; construction consultancy; operation of building equipment in the nature of building construction services; maintenance of building equipment; shipbuilding; repair or maintenance of ships; repair or maintenance of aircraft; repair or maintenance of automobiles; repair or maintenance of railway rolling stock; repair or maintenance of two-wheeled motor vehicles; repair or maintenance of nuclear power plants; repair or maintenance of gas turbine engines, not for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |