USPTO serial 79362835
SEON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for alarm and emergency systems; computer software for emitting emergency signals and messages; downloadable software in the form of mobile applications (apps) for safety monitoring; downloadable software in the form of mobile applications (apps) for alarm and emergency systems; downloadable software in the form of mobile applications (apps) for emitting emergency signals and messages; downloadable software for data transmission for personal security applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications for data transmission purposes (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); communications for safety monitoring purposes (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); communications for alarm and emergency systems (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); communications for transmitting emergency signals and messages (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); providing access to computer networks for emitting emergency signals and messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 28, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 27, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |