Drawing for PICTURE CROSS

USPTO serial 79363473

PICTURE CROSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICTURE CROSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

Peter J. Riebling Riebling IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 1025Washington, DC 20006-3951

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer game programs; downloadable video game programs; downloadable software for playing videos and on-line games; downloadable interactive computer game programs; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network; downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, handheld computers, computers, video game consoles and other wireless devices, both handheld and free standing; downloadable software for virtual currency and crypto currency, namely, downloadable software which enables users to purchase and trade virtual currency and crypto currency; downloadable application software for playing video games; downloadable software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customizing video, computer and on-line games; computer peripherals; mouse pads; downloadable audio visual games software for use on computer hardware platformsACTIVE—
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, providing online video games accessed and played via electronic, wireless and computer networks; providing online non-downloadable computer games that may be accessed network-wide by network users; providing on-line multi-user computer games via local computer networks, global computer networks and the Internet; providing online non-downloadable computer and video games accessed and played on electronic, wireless, and computer networks; providing online non-downloadable computer and video games accessed by or for use on mobile and cellular telephones and other wireless devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2024MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 20, 2024ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 11, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2024EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 28, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2023CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 9, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 7, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2023LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance