USPTO serial 79363485
VAIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VAIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chelsea A. Steadman
Chelsea A. Steadman Volpe Koenig30 S 17th StPhiladelphia, PA 19103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer programs for autonomous driving of vehicles; downloadable computer programs for autonomous driving of vehicles; recorded computer programs for the autonomous navigation of vehicles; downloadable computer programs for the autonomous navigation of vehicles; recorded computer programs for autonomous control of vehicles; downloadable computer programs for autonomous control of vehicles; recorded computer software for the coordination of transport services, namely, software for the automatic planning and sending of automotive vehicles; downloadable computer software for the coordination of transport services, namely, software for the automatic planning and sending of automotive vehicles; recorded software for providing information on parking facilities for vehicles; downloadable software for providing information on parking facilities for vehicles; recorded software and computer hardware for providing connections within a vehicle, between vehicles and with external units; downloadable software and computer hardware for providing connections within a vehicle, between vehicles and with external units; recorded software for the transmission of information about streets, vehicles, traffic and driving; downloadable software for the transmission of information about streets, vehicles, traffic and driving; light detection and ranging [LIDAR] apparatus; light detection and ranging [LIDAR] apparatus for vehicles; radar apparatus; radar systems comprised of radar apparatus; radar systems comprised of radar antennas; radar receivers; radar antennas | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable online software for providing transport navigation services, booking of transport services and dispatching automotive vehicles to customers; computer engineering services; providing online non-downloadable artificial intelligence computer programs for monitoring locations of fleet vehicles on data networks; platforms as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer platforms for monitoring locations of fleet vehicles using artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 27, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |