USPTO serial 79363498
AUDIENCLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIENCLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotional services; influencer marketing; promotion of goods and services through influencers; digital marketing; advertising, marketing and promotion consultancy; marketing plan development, preparation of marketing plans; analysis of marketing trends; marketing agency services; market campaigns; development of marketing concepts; advice relating to marketing management; advertising and marketing; advertising, marketing and promotional services via the internet; development of marketing strategies and concepts; arranging and conducting of marketing events; search engine marketing services; talent agencies; arranging of business introductions for influencers and support in the development and implementation of influencer campaigns; business management, for influencers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |