Drawing for OPTOLINE

USPTO serial 79364429

OPTOLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTOLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal E. Friedman

Neal E. Friedman Finch & Maloney PLLC50 Commercial Street, Suite 300Manchester, NH 03101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Photolithography machines; control devices for machines, engines or motors, namely, electronic controls; electric machines and apparatus for polishing watch parts and medical devices; machines for manufacturing semi-conductors; metalworking machines and machine tools; laser welding machines; cutting machines; metal cutting machines; machines for manufacture of watch parts and medical devices; machines for assembly of watch parts and medical devices; machines for bonding electromechanical micro-systems; micro-screwing machines; machines for watch jeweling.ACTIVE—
009Downloadable and recorded software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; mechanical devices, namely, dispensers of preset portions of fluids, solid granules and powder for dosing purposes, all not for medical use; lasers for measuring; flat panel display screens; touch-sensitive computer display and control screens; electronic monitoring apparatus, namely, wireless controllers to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; all-purpose cameras; video cameras; downloadable and recorded software for computer-aided design and manufacturing; downloadable and recorded software for machine managementACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, testing in the field of assembling machines, as well as research and design services relating thereto; engineering; design of machines, apparatus and instruments; provision of technical advice in the field of scientific and industrial research; design and development of computers and software; design, development and updating of software; rental of computer software for machine management; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; provision of temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software applications and software tools for machine management; software installation; updating of software; maintenance of software; programming for computers for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2023RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2023SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance