USPTO serial 79364733
GRIDUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWAY, TATIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRIDUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for software development; application programming interface (API) software that enables developers to build software applications for use in the retail and e-commerce industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Website design services; Website design consultancy; designing and developing websites for others; design consultancy; creating wireframes for websites and software; designing and developing software; designing and developing Software as a Service (SaaS); Software as a Service (SaaS) enabling users to access software features and templates to design and develop websites, featuring software for use in e-commerce and the retail industry; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software used to create and customize websites; technical software support services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in designing the infrastructure and appearance of a website; providing technological consultancy services and technical information in the fields of web analytics and web content management; application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for use in the creation, design, and content management of websites; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, providing customized online web pages and data feeds featuring user-defined information, blog posts, graphics, photographs, video, audio, audio/visual and multimedia content, and online web links to other websites; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining websites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |