USPTO serial 79364962
CLOUD BLACKBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAKESLEE, RICHARD A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUD BLACKBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for personal information management; recorded computer software for security operation to networks; recorded communications processing computer software; server for managing network; network data storing apparatus; computer software for providing security to networks; data security apparatus; data processing apparatus; security software; security computer application software for cellphones; software for ensuring the security of electronic mail; computer software for providing security concerning computer break-in; computer program for security service using home network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of IT security software; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer programming services for data warehousing; data security consultancy; data encryption and decoding services; maintenance of computer software for data processing; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; development of computer software for security management; development of software for secure network operations; consultancy relating to software maintenance; design and development of Internet security programs; design and development of electronic data security systems; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 9, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |