Drawing for ARTPAKK

USPTO serial 79365008

ARTPAKK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROJAS, ELINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARTPAKK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher McElwain

Christopher McElwain Knowmad Law484 Washington St., B-313Monterey, CA 93940United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Padding, cushioning and stuffing materials, except of paper, cardboard, rubber or plastics; bags of textile for packaging; envelopes and pouches of textile for packaging; mail bags, packing materials not of rubber, plastics, paper or cardboardACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance