USPTO serial 79365269
FJORD LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FJORD LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements; food supplements; dietary supplements; medicated food supplements; dietary food supplements; liquid nutritional supplements; dietary supplements for infants; dietary supplements for animals; dietary supplements for humans; dietary supplements for pets; dietary and nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements for veterinary use; dietary supplements for medical use; food supplements for veterinary use; nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; dietary supplements for human beings and animals; dietetic sweeteners for medical purposes; artificial sweeteners adapted for diabetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |