USPTO serial 79365726
CARATHFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARATHFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Ceramic insulating materials; ceramic fibers as thermal and electric insulating materials, in particular insulating cords | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Ceramic fibres, in particular aluminium oxide fibres, silicon oxide fibres and zircon oxide fibres and goods made therefrom and included in class 19, including ceramic wool, fireproof compounds, in particular based on refractory clay, sillimanite, bauxite, corundum, mullite, zircon mullite, chrome corundum, spinel, magnesite and silicon carbide; refractory concrete, in particular dense concrete, high-density shotcrete, low cement concrete, ultra-low cement concrete, insulation concrete, insulating injection concrete, special concrete and concrete shaped parts; refractory clay goods included in class 19, in particular unformed fireclay mass and fireproof cement, firebricks; clay-rich stones with a base of clay-rich soil, refractory clay, bauxite, sillimanite, mullite and corundum; fire burrs, namely, chrome corundum stone, zircon oxide stone, clay soil and magnesium spinel stone; acid resistant stone; ceramic binding mortar; chemically binding mortar; building materials, not of metal, namely, vacuum mouldings of ceramic wool, aluminium oxide wool, aluminium silicon wool, alkaline-earth silicon wool, mineral wool; the aforesaid vacuum mouldings with embedded heating elements; ceramic fibre paper, in particular based on aluminium silicon fibre, for buildings; ceramic fibre yarn and ceramic fibre textiles made therefrom, in particular ceramic fibre cords, ceramic fibre packages, ceramic fibre bands, ceramic fibre materials, for construction purposes; slide ceramics (raw materials) for steel casting ladles and continuous casting distributors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |