USPTO serial 79365968
PEIECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, LAURA KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEIECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communication devices for recording and transmitting audio data, video data, image data and other data and files; data processing equipment, in particular computers and servers for controlling and storing transmissions of audio data, video data, image data as well as other data; data processing equipment, in particular computers and servers for receiving and sending transmissions of audio data, video data, image data as well as other data; switches and switching sensors, especially electrical and electronic switches and switching sensors as well as electronic switches and switching sensors; wireless switches and switching sensors; information technology equipment, in particular data processing equipment for processing a data input as well as a data output; IO devices [input, output devices], especially for input and transmission of audio data, video data, image data and other data and files; software for control and operation of aforementioned devices; sensors, detectors and monitoring instruments and apparatuses; sensor controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |