USPTO serial 79366730
ROKIT LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROKIT LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smart glasses; wearable computers; wearable smart phones; wearable displays; wearable monitors; smart bracelets; smart rings; smart watches; wearable computer peripherals; wearable computer hardware; wearable activity trackers; wearable telecommunication apparatus; wearable communications apparatus; wearable computer peripheral devices; wearable video display monitors; wearable digital electronic communication devices; smart phones in the form of eyewear; wearable communications devices in the form of wristwatches; downloadable mobile applications for use with wearable computer devices; computer application software for use with wearable computer devices; wearable digital electronic devices capable of providing access to the internet; protective helmets; drivers' helmets; sports helmets; helmets for motorcyclists; helmets for bicycles; helmet communications systems; smart helmets; audio amplifiers; headphones; noise cancelling apparatus; musical instrument amplifiers; software to control and improve audio equipment sound quality; assistive listening devices for amplifying, filtering, and refining musical sounds; earphones; computer software; consumer electronics, namely, computers, or smartphones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |