Drawing for KONBINI BITES

USPTO serial 79367465

KONBINI BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KONBINI BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5Monroe, CT 06468United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Shipping containers of plastic; containers for transport, not of metal; boxes of plastic; industrial packaging containers of plasticsACTIVE—
029Fruit-based snack food; fruit-based food snacks; fruit-based, vegetable-based, bean-based or nut-based food snacks; dried flakes of fish, meat, vegetables or seaweed (furi-kake)ACTIVE—
030Aromatic preparations for food, extracts used as food flavoring, mint for confectionery, coffee flavorings, vanilla flavorings; grain-based sweets, bakery desserts and grain-based snack foods; sweets; confectionery, namely, puddings, fruit jellies, candy, cakes, doughnuts, crepes; chocolate desserts; dessert puddings; custard-based desserts; cereal-based desserts; cereal-based snacks; chocolate-based snacks; corn-based snack foods; flour-based snack foods; grain-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; seasonings, other than spices; spices; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; instant confectionery mixes, namely, instant pudding mixes, instant jelly mixes, instant candy mixes, instant cake mixes, instant doughnut mixes, instant crepe mixesACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring sweets, desserts, snacks, dried flakes of fish, meat, vegetables or seaweed (furi-kake), seasonings and spices, ice cream mixes, sherbet mixes, instant confectionery mixes; retail store services featuring sweets, desserts, snacks, dried flakes of fish, meat, vegetables or seaweed (furi-kake), seasonings and spices, ice cream mixes, sherbet mixes, instant confectionery mixes; online retail store services featuring confectionery; retail store services featuring confectionery; online retail store services featuring foods and beverages including confectionery in subscription boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 14, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2023LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance