USPTO serial 79367552
SPLISH SPLASH BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPLISH SPLASH BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls; doll accessories; dolls' clothes; shoes for dolls; doll playsets; jewellery for dolls; dolls for playing; toys; games; toy figures; toy furniture; toy jewellery; playhouses for children; toy pushchairs; toy tableware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |