USPTO serial 79368195
ONSLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, ALEXIS A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONSLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lip balm; make-up; cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; moisturizing creams, lotions and gels; body and beauty care cosmetics; sun block [cosmetics]; serums (cosmetics); skin lotions; nourishing cream (cosmetics); facial cream; facial cleansing grains; face oils; cosmetic creams and gels for the face, hands and body; skin cleansing foams; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; facial cleansers; functional cosmetics being skin care preparations; facial packs; exfoliant cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |