USPTO serial 79369287
CELADON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELADON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Automatic watches; cases [fitted] for horological articles; chronographs [watches]; chronological instruments; chronoscopes; clocks and parts therefor; clocks and watches; clockworks; cloisonne jewellery; custom jewellery; dials [clock- and watchmaking]; dress watches; electronic timepieces; faces for chronometric instruments; horological and chronometric instruments; jewellery; jewellery boxes; jewellery, precious and semi-precious stones; mechanical watches; movements for clocks and watches; ornaments [jewellery]; pendulums [clock- and watchmaking]; precious metals and their alloys; precious metals, unwrought or semi-wrought; presentation cases for horological articles; stopwatches; table clocks; timepieces; watch bands; watch bracelets; watch clasps; watch crowns; watch parts; watches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |