USPTO serial 79369363
ZEN FLORAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZEN FLORAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations in the form of mist; body sprays used as personal deodorants and fragrances; aromatic cosmetics; colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; soaps and detergents; laundry soap; perfumed soaps; dentifrices; mouthwash; mist aromatic oils; perfume and flavour materials; bases for flower perfumes; essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes; scented oils; incense; scented linen water; scented fabric refresher spray; scented room sprays; fragrances for automobiles; room fragrancing preparations; air fragrance reed diffusers; air fragrancing preparations; antistatic preparations for household purposes; de-greasing preparations for household purposes; rust removing preparations; stain removing benzine; fabric softeners for laundry use; laundry bleach; false nails; false eyelashes; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for affixing false hair; laundry starch; seaweed gelatine for laundry use; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; breath freshening preparations; deodorants for animals; paint stripping preparations; shoe cream; shoe polish; polishing preparations; sandpaper; abrasive cloth; abrasive sand; artificial pumice stone; polishing paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |