USPTO serial 79370330
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq. Munoz-Lopez & Associates PLLC305 BroadwaySuite 704New York, NY 10007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software applications for use in data analysis; downloadable software for compiling and organizing business intelligence; collaborative software for use in data management, data processing data analysis, and data testing; downloadable computer software for business data analysis; recorded computer software for data analysis; downloadable computer software for collaborating on shared documents; downloadable computer software for adding and storing data; recorded computer software for data processing; recorded computer software platforms for application development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in database management; computer services, namely, cloud hosting of computer databases for others; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in software development; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for machine learning; providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for use in software development; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware systems; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in database management | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |