USPTO serial 79370544
ONQLAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONQLAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) services; authentication, issuance and validation of digital certificates; compilation of data-processing programs; computer programming; computer programming services for data processing; computer security engineering; computer software design; computer software development; computer software programming services; computer support services (programming and software installation, repair and maintenance services); data cryptology services; data encryption services; computerised data storage services; data storage, other than physical storage; design of computer databases; design of computer programs; design of computer software; computer security services (design and development of secure computer hardware, software and systems); design and development of computer software; design and development of computer software for others; development of software; development of systems for the processing of data; development of systems for the storage of data; development of systems for the transmission of data; electronic data storage; hosting of databases; computer support services (software advisory and information services); information services relating to information technology; information technology (IT) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); online provision of web-based applications (non-downloadable); online provision of web-based software (non-downloadable); provision of online non-downloadable web-based software; platform as a service (PaaS); providing information, including online, about design and development of computer hardware and software; provision of information relating to computer programming; provision of information relating to information technology; hosting of software as a service (SaaS); software as a service (SaaS); software creation; computer software engineering; software engineering services for data processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |