USPTO serial 79370675
DUSTBLOCKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUSTBLOCKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebeccah Gan
Rebeccah Gan Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum cleaners for industrial purposes but not including handheld vacuum cleaners; dust exhausting installations and dust removing installations for cleaning purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Dust removing and dust absorbing installations for ventilation purposes, namely, air scrubbers, air cleaners, and air filters, and mobile air scrubbers, mobile air cleaners, and mobile air filters, all for industrial, construction, and remediation purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |