Drawing for .ONE

USPTO serial 79371368

.ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with .ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

Peter J. Riebling Riebling IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006-3951

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business assistance relating to domain namesACTIVE—
042Webhosting, namely, web site hosting services; hosting computer websitesACTIVE—
045Leasing of internet domain names featuring the TLD in the mark; registration of domain names featuring the TLD in the markACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 13, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 9, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance