USPTO serial 79371371
JORDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JORDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Peanut confectionery; cereal bars; high-protein cereal bars; bread rolls; buns; waffles; vermicelli (noodles); flour-based dumplings; oat flakes; biscuits; custard; leaven; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack food; edible paper; edible rice paper; caramels [sweets]; crackers; groats for human food; croûtons; liquorice [confectionery]; noodles; marzipan; pancakes; lozenges [confectionery]; pies; chips [cereal products]; fondants [confectionery]; popcorn; powders for making ice cream; fresh bread; gingerbread; puddings; cake powder; rice pudding; rice cakes; vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes; sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; spring rolls; rusks; breadcrumbs; petit-beurre biscuits; tacos; tapioca; tarts; cakes; dough; cake batter; tortillas; halvah; bread; sweets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |