USPTO serial 79371749
B BRUNETTE DOWNS GRASSFED AUSTRALIAN BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BRUNETTE DOWNS GRASSFED AUSTRALIAN BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greene
Jeffrey H. Greene Foley & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueCorner Hunter and Phillip StreetsNew York, NY 10016-1314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Grass fed meat and meat products, namely, frozen meat, processed meat, meat preserves, extracts of meat for culinary purposes, steaks, roasts, burgers, patties, sausages, mince, jerky, meatballs, brisket, schnitzels, corned beef, cubed meat, meatloaf and offal; grass fed beef and beef products, namely, frozen beef, processed beef, beef preserves, extracts of beef for culinary purposes, beef steaks, beef roasts, beef burgers, beef patties, beef sausages, beef mince, beef jerky, beef meatballs, beef brisket, beef schnitzels, corned beef, cubed beef, beef meatloaf and beef offal; fresh meats including grass-fed fresh meats; wagyu beef including grass-fed wagyu beef; meat extracts including grass-fed meat extracts; grass fed meat products offered by way of restaurant menus, namely, steaks, roasts, burgers, patties, sausages, mince, jerky, meatballs, brisket, schnitzels, corned beef, meatloaf and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Wholesaling and retailing of food, being wholesale and retail store services and retail distributorship services featuring meat and meat products including grass-fed meat and grass-fed meat products, namely, frozen meat, processed meat, meat preserves, extracts of meat for culinary purposes, steaks, roasts, burgers, patties, sausages, mince, jerky, meatballs, brisket, schnitzels, corned beef, fresh meat, fresh beef, wagyu beef, cubed meat, meatloaf, offal and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |