USPTO serial 79372623
NUSPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUSPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleansing milk for toilet purposes; shampoos; cakes of toilet soap; bath salts, not for medical purposes; dry shampoos; bath preparations, not for medical purposes; hair conditioners; essential oils; hair dyes; hair waving preparations; waving preparations for the hair; cosmetics; make-up removing preparations; depilatory wax; neutralizers for permanent waving; beard dyes; hair spray; sunscreen preparations; hair straightening preparations; cosmetic preparations for baths; make-up palettes containing cosmetics; bleaching preparations [decolorants] for cosmetic purposes; herbal extracts for cosmetic purposes; oils for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for affixing false hair; skin whitening creams; cosmetic preparations for skin care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |