Drawing for PROKON

USPTO serial 79372683

PROKON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROKON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HADI S AL SHATHIR

HADI S AL SHATHIR THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLAZAST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for processing graphics and 3D computer graphics; computer software that may be downloaded from a global computer network, namely, downloadable computer software for processing graphics and 3D computer graphics; downloadable computer graphics software; downloadable 3D computer graphics software; downloadable building information modelling (BIM) software; downloadable CAD software for use in the fields of architecture, construction, structural design, structural engineering, civil engineering, structural and geotechnical analysis; downloadable CAM software for general use; downloadable CAE software for use in the fields of architecture, construction, structural design, structural engineering, civil engineering, structural and geotechnical analysis; downloadable finite element analysis (FEA) software; downloadable instruction manuals and training manuals in electronic format in the field of software for building information modelling, computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing, computer-aided engineering, finite element analysis; recorded discs containing software for use in the fields of architecture, construction, structural design, structural engineering, civil engineering, structural and geotechnical analysis, namely, software for building information modelling, computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing, computer-aided engineering, finite element analysis; none of the aforesaid goods in the fields of fibre optics, telephony and telecommunications systemsACTIVE—
041Training and instruction in the use of software in the field of architecture, construction, structural engineering, civil engineering, structural analysis, geotechnical analysis, structural design and detailingACTIVE—
042Installation and configuration of software; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for processing graphics software and 3D computer graphics software; cloud computing services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; project assessment and development services, namely, consulting relating to development and implication; software consultancy services; software customisation services; software development; software development, programming and implementation; software installation; software maintenance services; project assessment and development services, namely, consulting relating to development in the area of computer software and computer software application; all the aforesaid in the field of architecture, construction, structural engineering, civil engineering, structural analysis, geotechnical analysis, structural design and detailing and none of the aforesaid services provided in the fields of fibre optics, telephony and telecommunications systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2025IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
May 29, 2025OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 26, 2025OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2025OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 23, 2025OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 13, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2024LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2023LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 28, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2023SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance