USPTO serial 79373256
KAPILUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAPILUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building materials; non-electric wires of common metal; wire gauze, netting and mesh, including as reinforcing material for transparent single or multi-layer panels and/or sheets of glass and/or plastic | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Insulating glass; safety glass; transparent and/or light scattering and/or insulating, in particular heat insulating sheets or panels of glass and/or plastic, in particular being single or multi-sheet and/or single or multi-layer insulating glass for building; transparent components of single or multi-sheet panels of glass and/or plastic | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architecture, design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |