USPTO serial 79373399
ANSELMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANSELMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Floor hinges of metal; pivots of metal (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); hinges of metal incorporating a spring; hinges of metal incorporating a spring; window hinges of metal; hinges of metal for the fixing of pipes; hinges of metal for the fastening of electrical cables; door hinges of metal; hinges of metal; hinges for doors and windows (metal -); lock bolts; metal bolts for locking doors; door bolts of metal; metal gate latches; door bolts of metal; lock bolts; nuts, bolts and fasteners, of metal; blind bolt fasteners of metal; latch bars of metal; hinging and retractable systems for doors (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); door hinges with reduced milling depth on the frame (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); door hinges flush with the wall (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); hinges for internal residential wired doors (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); retractable hinges (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |