USPTO serial 79373983
VERTIGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERTIGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times Square21st FloorNew York, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | woven fabrics; wall fabrics, namely, textile wall hangings; upholstery fabrics; furnishing and upholstery fabrics; woolen fabrics; hemp yarn fabrics; jute fabrics; cotton fabrics; linen cloths; silk fabrics; textile fabrics for the manufacture of furniture; mixed fiber fabrics intended for the manufacture of furniture; textile fabrics used in the manufacture of wall coverings; knitted fabrics; textile materials, namely, household linens; textiles and substitutes thereof, namely, curtains; tapestries of textile; textile furnishing articles, namely, decorative wall hangings of textile; textile wall panels, namely, textile signage panels; fabrics and textiles for use in the manufacture of works of art, namely, wall hangings of textile featuring mural art; hangings, namely, drapery; wall hangings of textile materials; hand-made textile wall hangings; removable replacement unfitted fabric seat covers for furniture; all of the foregoing marketed and sold only to design industry professionals through private showrooms, and not marketed and sold to the general public | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Wall hangings, namely, wall coverings of textile; fabric wall and ceiling coverings; wall hangings, not of textile; decorative wall hangings, not of textile materials; hand-made wall hangings, not made of textile; carpets and rugs of textile materials; carpets, rugs, mats and floor matting; all of the foregoing marketed and sold only to design industry professionals through private showrooms, and not marketed and sold to the general public | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Tapestry weaving; textile weaving services; tapestry weaving for third parties; custom manufacturing of hangings; custom manufacturing, namely, sewing services; custom manufacturing of roller blinds; custom manufacture of furniture; cloth dyeing; chemical treatment of textile; custom manufacturing of fabric and textile works of art; all of the foregoing marketed and provided only to design industry professionals through private showrooms, and not marketed and provided to the general public | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |