USPTO serial 79374544
LA MODE EN IMAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA MODE EN IMAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maurice B. Pilosof
Maurice B. Pilosof MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ.P.O. Box 691937West Hollywood, CA 90069United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education; training; entertainment; club services (entertainment or education); cultural activities; publication of books; electronic publication of books and journals online; providing non-downloadable electronic publications online; film production; rental or provision of cinematographic films, television sets, video tapes, phonographic recordings, sound recordings, audio apparatus, video cameras, radio sets, acoustic, magnetic and optical discs, audio and video compact discs, digital versatile optical disc players (DVD players), video cameras, cinema projection apparatus, cinematographic apparatus and accessories, stage and show scenery; organization of competitions relating to education or entertainment; organization of fashion shows for entertainment purposes; organization and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, conventions; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; information on educational or entertainment events; party planning [entertainment]; television and radio entertainment; production of radio and television programs; movie studio services; recording studio services; photography; photographic reporting; news reporter services; videotaping; videotape editing; microfilming; translation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Provision of food and beverages (meals); restaurant, cafe and bar services; cafeterias; catering services; temporary accommodation; accommodation agencies (hotels, boarding houses); hotel services; motel services; hotel, boarding house and temporary accommodation reservation services; holiday camp services (lodging); holiday homes; rental of chairs, tables, table linen and glassware; rental of transportable buildings; rental of temporary accommodation; rental of meeting rooms; rental of tents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2025 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |