USPTO serial 79377549
MILAB VIEWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILAB VIEWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis S. Prahl
Dennis S. Prahl Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable digital video recordings; downloadable image files; software for processing digital images; computer software for processing digital images; computer software for digital information and data access; computer software for communication between computers over a local network; computer software for wireless content delivery; computer programs and software for image processing; downloadable computer software for remote monitoring and analysis; computer programs for connecting to remote computers and computer networks; computer software for remote telecommunication; computer software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; computer software for use in medical decision support systems; computer programs and software for image processing used for mobile telephones; computer software to enable the transmission of photographs to mobile telephones; software for creating, facilitating, and managing remote access to and communication with local area networks and global networks; computer programs for searching the contents of computers and computer networks by remote control; computer programs for searching remotely for content on computers and computer networks; software for searching and retrieving information across a computer network; cloud server | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; electronic storage of digital images; software as a service; software development, programming and implementation; development, updating and maintenance of software and database systems; image processing software design; technological and scientific remote monitoring services relating to medical diagnostic devices (remote monitoring of medical diagnostic systems); technological analysis assistance services for medical image data; scientific research for medical purposes; design of medical diagnostic apparatus and instruments; development of computer software for use with medical equipment; providing computer software technical support services in the field of medical diagnostics; computer programming services for remote data management of medical diagnostic instruments; computer programming services for remote management of medical diagnostic systems; medical research laboratory services for predicting disease; electronic storage of images; design and development of image processing software; research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; cloud computing services; electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |