Drawing for ARCTEQ

USPTO serial 79378167

ARCTEQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCTEQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN T. COOPER

STEVEN T. COOPER FALCON RAPPAPORT & BERKMAN LLP265 SUNRISE HIGHWAYSUITE 50ROCKVILLE CENTRE, NY 11570

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical components in the nature of protection relays; circuit overload protector devices; overvoltage protection relays; electrical relays; safety electric relays; electric motor protection relays; electric current control devices; voltage regulators; electrical circuits and circuit boards; feeder cables; electrical distributing busbars, namely, power distributing box; transformers; inverters; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers, namely power controller and pressure indicators; electric current meters; electrical annunciators; electric current sensors; electric apparatus for scientific research in laboratories, namely, electric resistances; all the above-mentioned goods for use in the protection of electrical networks and electrical network systems, as well as in connection with protective relays and arc arresters used in electrical networks; downloadable software for monitoring, controlling and running physical world operations; downloadable electrical engineering software; computer hardware with embedded operated system software; downloadable software in the nature of middleware for management of software functions on electronic devices; downloadable electronic device software drivers that allow computer hardware and electronic devices to communicate with each other; none of the above mentioned goods in relation to access control products, video intercom products, audio intercom products, surveillance products, cameras, namely, digital cameras, network cameras, web cameras and ip-cameras, video encoders, video decoders, network document servers, print servers, network video products, radars, speakers, microphones and accessories for the above mentioned products; downloadable process controlling software, and all the above-mentioned goods for use in the protection of electrical networks and electrical network systems, as well as in connection with protective relays and arc flash detection, protection and mitigation used in electrical networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 15, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 15, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2025EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 11, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 11, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 27, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 26, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 26, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2023LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance