USPTO serial 79379280
LLAAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LLAAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and software applications; computer software and software applications for medical, pharmaceutical and biological use; computer equipment for analyzing and processing data; data, file and database management software; computer databases; electronic databases recorded on computer media; computer programs for accessing, browsing and searching online databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, installation, update, maintenance and temporary provision of software; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; designing and creatingon of computer software, software applications and databases; developingment and testing of methods, software algorithms and computer applications; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software, application software and databases; creation of databases; loan and rental of software, application software and databases; computer platform as a service enabling the aggregation, classification, centralization, sharing and processing of data; Software as a Service [SaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] for medical, pharmaceutical and biological use; Software as a service [SaaS] for aggregation, classification, centralization, sharing and processing of data; provision of online non-downloadable software; server hosting; rental of web servers; rental of software, application software; provision of software via a global computer network; hosting of software applications; hosting of computerized data, files, applications and information; design and development of software architecture; consultancying services in the field of with respect to computing, software, software applications, software architecture; computer advisory and auditing services; computer auditing services to verify the conformity of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |