USPTO serial 79380073
CRYSTALIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFITHS, SYDNEY V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRYSTALIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.3 Manhattanville RoadPurchase, NY 10577United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, phosphors and phosphors for use in the manufacture of led lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Quantum dots, namely, crystalline semi-conductor materials; light-emitting diodes (LED) and light emitting diode (LED) displays; organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis and testing in the field of lighting chemicals, crystalline semi-conductor materials, light emitting diodes; development in the nature of product development of lighting products; consultancy in the field of architectural, theatrical, entertainment, commercial, and residential lighting technology design, specification, and application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seaborough Materials Research B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Seaborough Materials IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Seaborough Research B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CRYSTALIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |