Drawing for MAM

USPTO serial 79380100

MAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Rissler

Andrew T. Rissler Patel & Almeida, P.C.20700 Ventura Blvd. Ste. 235Woodland Hills, CA 91364United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Table cutlery, namely, kitchen knives, forks being table cutlery and spoons being tableware; knives, namely, household knives, razor knives, working knives, utility knives, table knives, hunting knives, survival knives, knives for outdoor recreations and bushcraft knives; folding knives; multi-tool knives; trowels; soup spoons; jack knives; pocket knives; multi-function hand tools comprised primarily of pocket knives and also including table forks; all being articles for adults, all of which are made of metal, except for the handles which may be made of another material, other than plasticACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 5, 2025LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 16, 2025LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 22, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2024LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 21, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2024LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 16, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 15, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2023LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance