Drawing for M TYPE GAMMA MADE BY DÜRKOPP ADLER

USPTO serial 79380114

M TYPE GAMMA MADE BY DÜRKOPP ADLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CREEF, DAVIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M TYPE GAMMA MADE BY DÜRKOPP ADLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronni S. Jillions

Ronni S. Jillions Browdy and Neimark, PLLC1625 K St, NWSuite 550Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sewing machines; sewing machine motors; sewing machine installations, namely, sewing machines; servo motors for sewing machines; bobbins for sewing machines; winding machines being parts of sewing machines; pedal drives for sewing machines; industrial robot sewing machines; textile production machines; textile and leather sewing equipment, namely, sewing machines; motors other than for land vehicles; electric motors and their parts, other than for land vehicles; stacking machines other than fork-lift trucks; loaders in the nature of conveyors being machines; conveyors being machines; tufting machines; welding machines, electric, welding generators, laser welding machines, welding machines, ultrasonic, hot pressure welding machines; ultrasonic electric welding machines; supersonic wave electric welding machines; electric strip welding machines; cutting machines; cutters being cutting machines; laser cutting machines; ultrasonic cutting machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 21, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 14, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance