USPTO serial 79380220
DE MACROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WICKERSHAM, JUSTIN SPENCER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DE MACROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles; sports cars; passenger cars; vans for carrying more than seven passengers; parts and fittings for automobiles, namely, structural parts therefor, automobile bodies, engines, transmissions and wheels; motorcycles; bicycles; parts and fittings for bicycles, namely, bicycle frames and wheels; tires for vehicle wheels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |